Education 2.0/3.0 – Permission to think, Sir?
Another post on education, while I can still write from the perspective of being officially in the system!
Educational Myths?
So, here are several of the educational myths that have been floating around for years. Perhaps myths is not the word that is most apt. Beliefs?
1. Asians are smarter than Westerners.
Asians score better on tests than Westerns. Almost all social psychology texts will milk this example to death. Studies have shown that just telling Westerners that they are going to take a test and be compared to Asians apparently triggers stereotype threat, and causes them to do worse on a test. Interesting.
2. Asians are less creative than Westerners.
And they typically blame it on the rote learning most Asian children are subjected to. Honestly, this is a horrible generalization. Just look at Japan. It is a world of it’s own and anyone who has ever been there and even try to figure out why half the inventions actually made it to market will testify to that. They have amazing things going on there, and they are Asian.
3. Art is only for those who cannot make it into the Science stream.
My personal pet peeve, because I see no reason why people can’t be good at both. May I point skeptics towards this recent article from the Financial Times on what the MBA curriculum looks set to incorporate in the future. Assuming that those who are accepted into an MBA program are supposed to be of a certain caliber, and assuming that those who designed the program are also not merely of average intelligence, all I ask is that the creative/art aspect gets the respect it deserves. It is not to say that one is better than the other, but I honestly believe that all disciplines are complementary, so lets drop the segregation already!
4. And of course, the age old discourse - to memorize or not to memorize, which Daryl and Mark have written on as well. If you ask me, this as a topic is exceedingly close to our hearts to generate all these thoughts amongst other Singaporeans. When I first read the RWW article, it just resonated with me, as a student. Judging from the offline conversations that I’ve had recently and all the other posts floating around in the blogosphere, I don’t think I am alone in this. We sat through a system where basically one hadhas to turn into a sponge, and the more you can get in and regurgitate later, the better, never mind if you truly understood it or not. Why else would our Chinese corrections in high school be instructions to copy the same sentence 10 times over?
(P.s Quick tip: If you tie a couple of pens together, this makes the task faster. I am proud to say I can handle up to 3 pens at one go. Align them properly to fit the lines and you’re good. Blank paper works best because then you don’t have to worry about misalignment. But I digress.
)
Balance
My point is, with the growing knowledge base of information out there, it is becoming increasingly difficult to know everything. Actually, it is not difficult, it is impossible. Yes, there should be a basic “syllabus” that all children ought to go through, but beyond that, is rote learning and memorization all that essential? I would rather be trained in the methods to help me deal with the various kinds of information, and to analyze what is out there. I cannot fathom why academic journals are sometimes written in such complex ways when the entire research finding could (and is) summarized beautifully in the abstract paragraph. I would rather be trained to be able to think and discern between a valid argument and one that is unsound.
On the flip side, I have to say that sometimes it is not good to focus too much and gripe about the fact that memorization is needed. Sometimes, it is the discipline that goes on behind it, the rigor and persistence of having to deal with and master all that material – that is the real lesson. So it is not really exactly what you are memorizing, but rather, the process that you are going through that you are supposed to learn from.
Also, not everyone has the same level of that need for cognition. And that is fine, because everyone should know themselves best and what they are comfortable with. There is no need to pressurize students into taking all sorts of creative thinking classes and try to force creativity into (or out of) them. It really does not work that way. Provide the channels, provide the tools, and those who enjoy it will naturally make use of what they have learnt. I’m also rather hesitant to box in or label what creativity does and does not entail because that seems to go against what it intrinsically stands for. Everyone can be creative in their own ways. Problem solving is creative. Producing an art work is creative. Writing a story or poem is creative. There is no one definition.
I think that the phrase, “Use it, or lose it“, pretty much sums up everything. If you are going to memorize it, make sure you use it, or it is just going to be lost. An ideal educational system for me combines the best aspects of both rote learning, and creative thinking, allowing for a fluid flexibility and hopefully creating diverse opinions amongst the student population. It is not inspiring to talk to one student, and find out that all of them think the same way. That’s great if you only want a nation of doers, but we definitely need much more than that, going into the future. It is also a psychological weakness, because you(all) become too predictable.
From the abovementioned FT article -
“We do think it is important for pedagogical reasons to do something different. We need to create a little space for people, to really get people to open up and think more reflectively and critically,” says David Bach, academic director of the international MBA programme at IE business school in Madrid, and professor of strategy and economic environment.
If you want a generation of thinkers to emerge and lead the country, please provide them with space to think. Train them to think.
I don’t have to ask that you allow them to think, because, once they know how to, I believe that they are going to engage in it regardless of what anyone says.
..Your thoughts?
My previous posts on education here.
Tags: education, asian, western, school, learning, education2.0, creative thinking, creativity, rote learning, memorization, think, training,










This is insightful. In education there seems to be a pendulum that swings back and fourth. If all teachers would strive for balance, the students would be much better off.
Hi Cullen,
Thanks for your perspective. I’m totally with you on the balance issue. Teachers are especially essential in the early years of schooling because of all that power they have to shape the younger generation. After that, they seem to be best adopting some sort of guidance role.
[...] Spotlight: Cornell University (EarthFirst.com) * Education 2.0/3.0 – Permission to think, Sir? (Dorothy Poon.com) * Education 2.0 (Featured Slideshows) * The Digital Youth Project: Teen Socialization and the [...]
Hi Dorothy. I’ve cross linked your post because it was thought provoking. I’m particularly interesting in your opening points 1 & 2. Being Asian, I guess you’re qualified to comment
Having worked in education in Japan myself I concur with your points – there are many myths and stereotypes. Education, youth and culture are 3 areas I’m passionate about so very happy you posted this.
I think the nub of the problem is that all instutional educational systems (East or West) are based on industrial-era concepts and poorly equip the students of today. For example, if a manager failed to co-operate with her counterparts she would be in trouble – yet in the exam room we are penalized if we talk to the next person! Very few candidates these days can write properly, present or organize their ideas onto 1 sheet of paper favouring a 10,000 word essay. When was the last time you read a 10,000 word report?
Stephen Covey said that the half-life of all the content we learn at university is 2 years. So, you’re right about the “basics” Dorothy – the core skills rather than the “content” – this is what we need to teach; how to learn, how to network, how to present etc. This is about as much as we can hope to impart on the next generation of learners through schooling.
I’ve interviewed many graduates who come out of university thinking university is about learning, workplace about doing. The irony is that it’s the other way round and education is a lifelong process.
[...] Spotlight: Cornell University (EarthFirst.com) * Education 2.0/3.0 – Permission to think, Sir? (Dorothy Poon.com) * Education 2.0 (Featured Slidshows) * The Digital Youth Project (On Social Marketing and Social [...]
Leave your response!
About Me
Contact Me
My Illustration Site
Recent Posts
My Twitter Feed
Connect with Me
Categories
I’ve “talked” about…
Calendar
R.E.S.P.E.C.T
Archives
Community
Already a member?Login
Most Commented
Recent Comments